Marieholm S20 vs Sunwind 20
How do the Marieholm S20 and Sunwind 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marieholm S20 | Marieholm S20 | Sunwind 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 17.2 ft5.25 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.90 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 2,756 lb1,250 kg | 3,527 lb1,600 kg |
| Ballast | 882 lb400 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 226 ft²21.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.65 | 15.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 241 | 357 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.0 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.4 |
| Average used price | €1,100 | €900 |
Marieholm S20 vs Sunwind 20: the short version
- The Marieholm S20 and Sunwind 20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Sunwind 20 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sunwind 20 carries the more powerful rig (15.6 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sunwind 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm S20 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.