Marieholm S20 vs Triss Magnum
How do the Marieholm S20 and Triss Magnum compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marieholm S20 | Marieholm S20 | Triss Magnum | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 17.2 ft5.25 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.90 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 2,756 lb1,250 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | 882 lb400 kg | 1,235 lb560 kg |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 248 ft²23.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.65 | 21.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 241 | 3007 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.0 | 22.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| Average used price | €1,100 | €1,000 |
Marieholm S20 vs Triss Magnum: the short version
- The Marieholm S20 and Triss Magnum are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Marieholm S20 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Triss Magnum carries the more powerful rig (21.3 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Triss Magnum scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm S20 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.