Mariehom IF vs Parker Dawson 26
How do the Mariehom IF and Parker Dawson 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mariehom IF | Mariehom IF | Parker Dawson 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.8 ft7.86 m | 25.7 ft7.83 m |
| Waterline length | 19.9 ft6.05 m | 22.2 ft6.76 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.20 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.21 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 280 ft²26.0 m² | 270 ft²25.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.64 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 277 | 164 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.9 | 16.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €2,900 | — |
Mariehom IF vs Parker Dawson 26: the short version
- The Mariehom IF and Parker Dawson 26 are close in length (25.8 ft7.86 m vs 25.7 ft7.83 m ).
- The Mariehom IF is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Parker Dawson 26 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mariehom IF scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mariehom IF rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.