Mariner 19 vs Paceship 20
How do the Mariner 19 and Paceship 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mariner 19 
Paceship 20 | Mariner 19 | Paceship 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.2 ft5.84 m | 19.3 ft5.87 m |
| Waterline length | 17.8 ft5.41 m | 17.2 ft5.24 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft1.01 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 1,430 lb649 kg | 800 lb363 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 184 ft²17.1 m² | 155 ft²14.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.19 | 28.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 114 | 70 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.1 | 4.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.49 | 3.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Mariner 19 vs Paceship 20: the short version
- The Mariner 19 and Paceship 20 are close in length (19.2 ft5.84 m vs 19.3 ft5.87 m ).
- The Mariner 19 is heavier, displacing about 79% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 20 carries the more powerful rig (28.8 vs 23.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mariner 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mariner 19 rates better for offshore work (2.49 vs 3.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.