Marlow-Hunter 40 vs Marlow-Hunter 42SS
How do the Marlow-Hunter 40 and Marlow-Hunter 42SS compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marlow-Hunter 40 | Marlow-Hunter 40 | Marlow-Hunter 42SS | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.3 ft12.57 m | 41.3 ft12.57 m |
| Waterline length | 36.0 ft10.97 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Beam | 13.2 ft4.01 m | 13.2 ft4.01 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.57 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Displacement | 19,700 lb8,936 kg | 19,098 lb8,663 kg |
| Ballast | 6,027 lb2,734 kg | 5,425 lb2,461 kg |
| Sail area | 1,006 ft²93.5 m² | 970 ft²90.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.07 | 21.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 183 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.2 | 25.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 8.0 |
Marlow-Hunter 40 vs Marlow-Hunter 42SS: the short version
- The Marlow-Hunter 40 and Marlow-Hunter 42SS are close in length (41.3 ft12.57 m vs 41.3 ft12.57 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 40 carries the more powerful rig (22.1 vs 21.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marlow-Hunter 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marlow-Hunter 40 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.