Marlow-Hunter 40 vs Morgan Out Island 41
How do the Marlow-Hunter 40 and Morgan Out Island 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marlow-Hunter 40 | Marlow-Hunter 40 | Morgan Out Island 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.3 ft12.57 m | 41.3 ft12.57 m |
| Waterline length | 36.0 ft10.97 m | 34.0 ft10.36 m |
| Beam | 13.2 ft4.01 m | 13.8 ft4.21 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.57 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Displacement | 19,700 lb8,936 kg | 24,000 lb10,886 kg |
| Ballast | 6,027 lb2,734 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Sail area | 1,006 ft²93.5 m² | 776 ft²72.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.07 | 14.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 188 | 273 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.2 | 31.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.8 |
Marlow-Hunter 40 vs Morgan Out Island 41: the short version
- The Marlow-Hunter 40 and Morgan Out Island 41 are close in length (41.3 ft12.57 m vs 41.3 ft12.57 m ).
- The Morgan Out Island 41 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 40 carries the more powerful rig (22.1 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Morgan Out Island 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Morgan Out Island 41 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.