Marlow-Hunter 42SS vs Marlow-Hunter 47
How do the Marlow-Hunter 42SS and Marlow-Hunter 47 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marlow-Hunter 42SS | Marlow-Hunter 42SS | Marlow-Hunter 47 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.3 ft12.57 m | 50.5 ft15.39 m |
| Waterline length | 36.0 ft10.97 m | 44.7 ft13.62 m |
| Beam | 13.2 ft4.01 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 19,098 lb8,663 kg | 36,000 lb16,329 kg |
| Ballast | 5,425 lb2,461 kg | 12,500 lb5,670 kg |
| Sail area | 970 ft²90.1 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 21.72 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.4 | 32.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 9.0 |
Marlow-Hunter 42SS vs Marlow-Hunter 47: the short version
- The Marlow-Hunter 47 is the larger boat at 50.5 ft15.39 m LOA versus 41.3 ft12.57 m for the Marlow-Hunter 42SS.
- The Marlow-Hunter 47 is heavier, displacing about 89% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Marlow-Hunter 47 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marlow-Hunter 47 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.