Marlow-Hunter 42SS vs Morgan Out Island 41
How do the Marlow-Hunter 42SS and Morgan Out Island 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Marlow-Hunter 42SS | Morgan Out Island 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.3 ft12.57 m | 41.3 ft12.57 m |
| Waterline length | 36.0 ft10.97 m | 34.0 ft10.36 m |
| Beam | 13.2 ft4.01 m | 13.8 ft4.21 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Displacement | 19,098 lb8,663 kg | 24,000 lb10,886 kg |
| Ballast | 5,425 lb2,461 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Sail area | 970 ft²90.1 m² | 776 ft²72.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.72 | 14.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 273 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.4 | 31.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.8 |
Marlow-Hunter 42SS vs Morgan Out Island 41: the short version
- The Marlow-Hunter 42SS and Morgan Out Island 41 are close in length (41.3 ft12.57 m vs 41.3 ft12.57 m ).
- The Morgan Out Island 41 is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 42SS carries the more powerful rig (21.7 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Morgan Out Island 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Morgan Out Island 41 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.