Marshall 22 vs Starwind 223
How do the Marshall 22 and Starwind 223 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marshall 22 
Starwind 223 | Marshall 22 | Starwind 223 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.2 ft6.76 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 19.3 ft5.89 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.58 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 5,660 lb2,567 kg | 2,435 lb1,104 kg |
| Ballast | 850 lb386 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 221 ft²20.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 19.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 260 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.4 | 10.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 5.9 |
Marshall 22 vs Starwind 223: the short version
- The Marshall 22 and Starwind 223 are close in length (22.2 ft6.76 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Marshall 22 is heavier, displacing about 132% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Marshall 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marshall 22 rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.