Maxi 68 vs Starwind 223
How do the Maxi 68 and Starwind 223 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi 68 
Starwind 223 | Maxi 68 | Starwind 223 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.3 ft6.80 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.95 m | 19.3 ft5.89 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.40 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.2 ft1.29 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,527 lb1,600 kg | 2,435 lb1,104 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 221 ft²20.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 19.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 212 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.1 | 10.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €3,000 | — |
Maxi 68 vs Starwind 223: the short version
- The Maxi 68 and Starwind 223 are close in length (22.3 ft6.80 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Maxi 68 is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Maxi 68 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi 68 rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.