Maxi 84 vs Santana 27
How do the Maxi 84 and Santana 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi 84 | Maxi 84 | Santana 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.1 ft8.25 m | 27.0 ft8.24 m |
| Waterline length | 23.6 ft7.20 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 7,937 lb3,600 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Ballast | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Sail area | 441 ft²41.0 m² | 348 ft²32.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.73 | 19.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 269 | 196 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.2 | 17.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €9,500 | — |
Maxi 84 vs Santana 27: the short version
- The Maxi 84 and Santana 27 are close in length (27.1 ft8.25 m vs 27.0 ft8.24 m ).
- The Maxi 84 is heavier, displacing about 59% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 27 carries the more powerful rig (19.0 vs 17.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi 84 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi 84 rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.