Maxi 95 vs Sprint 95
How do the Maxi 95 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi 95 | Maxi 95 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.2 ft9.50 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 10.4 ft3.16 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 11,023 lb5,000 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 3,527 lb1,600 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 506 ft²47.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 16.35 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 294 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.7 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | €18,000 | — |
Maxi 95 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Maxi 95 and Sprint 95 are close in length (31.2 ft9.50 m vs 31.1 ft9.48 m ).
- The Maxi 95 is heavier, displacing about 123% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Maxi 95 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi 95 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.