Maxi 999 vs Watkins 32
How do the Maxi 999 and Watkins 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi 999 | Maxi 999 | Watkins 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.5 ft9.91 m | 32.5 ft9.91 m |
| Waterline length | 26.9 ft8.20 m | 26.6 ft8.10 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.23 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 9,259 lb4,200 kg | 10,800 lb4,899 kg |
| Ballast | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Sail area | 635 ft²59.0 m² | 469 ft²43.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.04 | 15.36 |
| Displacement / Length | 212 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.6 | 26.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 6.9 |
| Average used price | €37,000 | — |
Maxi 999 vs Watkins 32: the short version
- The Maxi 999 and Watkins 32 are close in length (32.5 ft9.91 m vs 32.5 ft9.91 m ).
- The Watkins 32 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi 999 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 32 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.