Maxi Magic vs Mirage 26
How do the Maxi Magic and Mirage 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi Magic 
Mirage 26 | Maxi Magic | Mirage 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.97 m | 26.2 ft7.98 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 21.7 ft6.61 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 4,770 lb2,164 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 2,050 lb930 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 313 ft²29.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 17.67 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 209 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 16.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €9,000 | — |
Maxi Magic vs Mirage 26: the short version
- The Maxi Magic and Mirage 26 are close in length (26.1 ft7.97 m vs 26.2 ft7.98 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Magic carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 17.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi Magic scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi Magic rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.