Maxi Magic vs Yamaha 26
How do the Maxi Magic and Yamaha 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi Magic | Maxi Magic | Yamaha 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.97 m | 26.2 ft7.98 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.90 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 4,343 lb1,970 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 1,433 lb650 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 290 ft²26.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 17.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 209 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 15.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €9,000 | — |
Maxi Magic vs Yamaha 26: the short version
- The Maxi Magic and Yamaha 26 are close in length (26.1 ft7.97 m vs 26.2 ft7.98 m ).
- The Maxi Magic is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Magic carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Maxi Magic scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Maxi Magic rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.