Maxi Racer vs Mirage 26
How do the Maxi Racer and Mirage 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi Racer 
Mirage 26 | Maxi Racer | Mirage 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.97 m | 26.2 ft7.98 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 21.7 ft6.61 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 4,770 lb2,164 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 2,050 lb930 kg |
| Sail area | 409 ft²38.0 m² | 313 ft²29.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.11 | 17.67 |
| Displacement / Length | 140 | 209 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.5 | 16.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.29 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €4,500 | — |
Maxi Racer vs Mirage 26: the short version
- The Maxi Racer and Mirage 26 are close in length (26.1 ft7.97 m vs 26.2 ft7.98 m ).
- The Mirage 26 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Racer carries the more powerful rig (26.1 vs 17.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirage 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirage 26 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.29).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.