Maxi Racer vs Tur 80
How do the Maxi Racer and Tur 80 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi Racer | Maxi Racer | Tur 80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.97 m | 26.1 ft7.96 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 8.2 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 3.5 ft1.08 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 5,071 lb2,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 409 ft²38.0 m² | 366 ft²34.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.11 | 19.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 140 | 228 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.5 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.29 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €4,500 | €3,100 |
Maxi Racer vs Tur 80: the short version
- The Maxi Racer and Tur 80 are close in length (26.1 ft7.97 m vs 26.1 ft7.96 m ).
- The Tur 80 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Racer carries the more powerful rig (26.1 vs 19.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Tur 80 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tur 80 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.29).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.