Maxi Racer vs Yamaha 26
How do the Maxi Racer and Yamaha 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Maxi Racer | Maxi Racer | Yamaha 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.1 ft7.97 m | 26.2 ft7.98 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 4,343 lb1,970 kg |
| Ballast | 1,653 lb750 kg | 1,433 lb650 kg |
| Sail area | 409 ft²38.0 m² | 290 ft²26.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.11 | 17.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 140 | 209 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.5 | 15.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.29 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €4,500 | — |
Maxi Racer vs Yamaha 26: the short version
- The Maxi Racer and Yamaha 26 are close in length (26.1 ft7.97 m vs 26.2 ft7.98 m ).
- The Yamaha 26 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Maxi Racer carries the more powerful rig (26.1 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Yamaha 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Yamaha 26 rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.29).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.