Mirage 24 vs Mirage 26
How do the Mirage 24 and Mirage 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mirage 24 
Mirage 26 | Mirage 24 | Mirage 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.8 ft7.26 m | 26.2 ft7.98 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 21.7 ft6.61 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.57 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 3,700 lb1,678 kg | 4,770 lb2,164 kg |
| Ballast | 1,500 lb680 kg | 2,050 lb930 kg |
| Sail area | 223 ft²20.7 m² | 313 ft²29.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.92 | 17.67 |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 209 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.8 | 16.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
Mirage 24 vs Mirage 26: the short version
- The Mirage 26 is the larger boat at 26.2 ft7.98 m LOA versus 23.8 ft7.26 m for the Mirage 24.
- The Mirage 26 is heavier, displacing about 29% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Mirage 26 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirage 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirage 24 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.