Mirage 24 vs Mirage 30 SX
How do the Mirage 24 and Mirage 30 SX compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mirage 24 
Mirage 30 SX | Mirage 24 | Mirage 30 SX | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.8 ft7.26 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 24.1 ft7.35 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.57 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 3,700 lb1,678 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Ballast | 1,500 lb680 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 223 ft²20.7 m² | 474 ft²44.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.92 | 23.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 188 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.8 | 15.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.32 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.6 |
Mirage 24 vs Mirage 30 SX: the short version
- The Mirage 30 SX is the larger boat at 30.0 ft9.14 m LOA versus 23.8 ft7.26 m for the Mirage 24.
- The Mirage 30 SX is heavier, displacing about 59% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Mirage 30 SX carries the more powerful rig (23.2 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirage 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirage 24 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.32).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.