Mirage 24 vs Mirage 32
How do the Mirage 24 and Mirage 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mirage 24 
Mirage 32 | Mirage 24 | Mirage 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.8 ft7.26 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.57 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 3,700 lb1,678 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | 1,500 lb680 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Sail area | 223 ft²20.7 m² | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.92 | 17.32 |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 203 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.8 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.8 |
Mirage 24 vs Mirage 32: the short version
- The Mirage 32 is the larger boat at 32.0 ft9.75 m LOA versus 23.8 ft7.26 m for the Mirage 24.
- The Mirage 32 is heavier, displacing about 116% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Mirage 32 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Mirage 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirage 32 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.