Mirage 25 vs Mirage 32
How do the Mirage 25 and Mirage 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mirage 25 
Mirage 32 | Mirage 25 | Mirage 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.2 ft7.67 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 4,400 lb1,996 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | 1,600 lb726 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 433 ft²40.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 17.32 |
| Displacement / Length | 212 | 203 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.2 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.32 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.8 |
Mirage 25 vs Mirage 32: the short version
- The Mirage 32 is the larger boat at 32.0 ft9.75 m LOA versus 25.2 ft7.67 m for the Mirage 25.
- The Mirage 32 is heavier, displacing about 82% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Mirage 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mirage 32 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.32).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.