Mirage 27 vs Sea Sprite 27
How do the Mirage 27 and Sea Sprite 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Mirage 27 | Sea Sprite 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.9 ft8.51 m | 27.9 ft8.51 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 8.8 ft2.69 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 7,600 lb3,447 kg |
| Ballast | 2,200 lb998 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 313 ft²29.1 m² | 341 ft²31.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.69 | 14.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 228 | 424 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.6 | 28.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 1.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.0 |
Mirage 27 vs Sea Sprite 27: the short version
- The Mirage 27 and Sea Sprite 27 are close in length (27.9 ft8.51 m vs 27.9 ft8.51 m ).
- The Sea Sprite 27 is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Mirage 27 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 14.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sea Sprite 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sea Sprite 27 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Mirage 27