Moorings 295 vs Neptunkryssare
How do the Moorings 295 and Neptunkryssare compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Moorings 295 
Neptunkryssare | Moorings 295 | Neptunkryssare | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.5 ft8.99 m | 29.5 ft9.00 m |
| Waterline length | 27.0 ft8.23 m | 19.2 ft5.85 m |
| Beam | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 6.3 ft1.92 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 7,500 lb3,402 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | 2,680 lb1,216 kg | 1,190 lb540 kg |
| Sail area | 400 ft²37.2 m² | 204 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.70 | 17.56 |
| Displacement / Length | 170 | 160 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.2 | 15.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 5.9 |
Moorings 295 vs Neptunkryssare: the short version
- The Moorings 295 and Neptunkryssare are close in length (29.5 ft8.99 m vs 29.5 ft9.00 m ).
- The Moorings 295 is heavier, displacing about 196% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Neptunkryssare carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Moorings 295 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Neptunkryssare rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.