Nash 26 vs Outlaw 26
How do the Nash 26 and Outlaw 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nash 26 
Outlaw 26 | Nash 26 | Outlaw 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.0 ft7.92 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Waterline length | 21.3 ft6.48 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 5,050 lb2,291 kg |
| Ballast | 2,100 lb953 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Sail area | 288 ft²26.8 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.35 | 15.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 242 | 329 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.5 | 23.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 5.8 |
Nash 26 vs Outlaw 26: the short version
- The Nash 26 and Outlaw 26 are close in length (26.0 ft7.92 m vs 26.0 ft7.92 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Outlaw 26 carries the more powerful rig (15.8 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Outlaw 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Outlaw 26 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.