Nash 26 vs Sandstream 26
How do the Nash 26 and Sandstream 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nash 26 
Sandstream 26 | Nash 26 | Sandstream 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.0 ft7.92 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Waterline length | 21.3 ft6.48 m | 24.5 ft7.47 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 9.4 ft2.87 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 2,100 lb953 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Sail area | 288 ft²26.8 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 15.35 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 242 | 137 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.6 |
Nash 26 vs Sandstream 26: the short version
- The Nash 26 and Sandstream 26 are close in length (26.0 ft7.92 m vs 26.0 ft7.92 m ).
- The Nash 26 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Nash 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nash 26 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.