Nautical 39 vs Santana 39
How do the Nautical 39 and Santana 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nautical 39 | Nautical 39 | Santana 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Waterline length | 32.5 ft9.91 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 22,500 lb10,206 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Sail area | 677 ft²62.9 m² | 686 ft²63.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.59 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 293 | 245 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.9 | 30.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.70 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.6 |
Nautical 39 vs Santana 39: the short version
- The Nautical 39 and Santana 39 are close in length (39.0 ft11.89 m vs 39.0 ft11.89 m ).
- The Nautical 39 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 39 carries the more powerful rig (16.0 vs 13.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautical 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nautical 39 rates better for offshore work (1.70 vs 1.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.