Nautor 105 vs Swan 100
How do the Nautor 105 and Swan 100 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nautor 105 | Nautor 105 | Swan 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 82.3 ft25.10 m | 86.8 ft26.46 m |
| Waterline length | 82.3 ft25.10 m | 86.8 ft26.46 m |
| Beam | 25.4 ft7.74 m | 23.2 ft7.06 m |
| Draft | 13.2 ft4.02 m | 13.2 ft4.02 m |
| Displacement | 249,122 lb113,000 kg | 158,733 lb72,000 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 63,934 lb29,000 kg |
| Sail area | 5,412 ft²502.8 m² | 4,947 ft²459.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.87 | 27.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 199 | 108 |
| Comfort ratio | 63.0 | 43.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.2 | 12.5 |
Nautor 105 vs Swan 100: the short version
- The Swan 100 is the larger boat at 86.8 ft26.46 m LOA versus 82.3 ft25.10 m for the Nautor 105.
- The Nautor 105 is heavier, displacing about 57% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 100 carries the more powerful rig (27.0 vs 21.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautor 105 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nautor 105 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.71).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.