Nautor 105 vs Swan 112 RS
How do the Nautor 105 and Swan 112 RS compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nautor 105 | Nautor 105 | Swan 112 RS | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 82.3 ft25.10 m | 92.4 ft28.16 m |
| Waterline length | 82.3 ft25.10 m | 92.4 ft28.16 m |
| Beam | 25.4 ft7.74 m | 24.3 ft7.42 m |
| Draft | 13.2 ft4.02 m | 14.4 ft4.40 m |
| Displacement | 249,122 lb113,000 kg | 242,508 lb110,000 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 61,729 lb28,000 kg |
| Sail area | 5,412 ft²502.8 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 21.87 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 199 | 137 |
| Comfort ratio | 63.0 | 57.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 1.56 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.2 | 12.9 |
Nautor 105 vs Swan 112 RS: the short version
- The Swan 112 RS is the larger boat at 92.4 ft28.16 m LOA versus 82.3 ft25.10 m for the Nautor 105.
- The Nautor 105 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 112 RS rates better for offshore work (1.56 vs 1.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.