Nautor 105 vs Swan 62
How do the Nautor 105 and Swan 62 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nautor 105 
Swan 62 | Nautor 105 | Swan 62 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 82.3 ft25.10 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Waterline length | 82.3 ft25.10 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Beam | 25.4 ft7.74 m | 17.5 ft5.34 m |
| Draft | 13.2 ft4.02 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Displacement | 249,122 lb113,000 kg | 62,832 lb28,500 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 24,692 lb11,200 kg |
| Sail area | 5,412 ft²502.8 m² | 2,392 ft²222.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.87 | 24.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 199 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 63.0 | 41.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.61 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.2 | 9.7 |
Nautor 105 vs Swan 62: the short version
- The Nautor 105 is the larger boat at 82.3 ft25.10 m LOA versus 52.2 ft15.90 m for the Swan 62.
- The Nautor 105 is heavier, displacing about 296% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 62 carries the more powerful rig (24.2 vs 21.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautor 105 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nautor 105 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 1.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.