Nautor 43 vs Swan 61
How do the Nautor 43 and Swan 61 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nautor 43 | Nautor 43 | Swan 61 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 48.2 ft14.68 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 48.2 ft14.68 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Displacement | 33,069 lb15,000 kg | 61,068 lb27,700 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | 20,300 lb9,208 kg |
| Sail area | 832 ft²77.3 m² | 1,656 ft²153.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.92 | 17.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 472 | 244 |
| Comfort ratio | 49.0 | 47.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.73 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 9.3 |
Nautor 43 vs Swan 61: the short version
- The Swan 61 is the larger boat at 48.2 ft14.68 m LOA versus 31.5 ft9.60 m for the Nautor 43.
- The Swan 61 is heavier, displacing about 85% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 61 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 12.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautor 43 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 61 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 1.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.