Nautor 43 vs Swan 66
How do the Nautor 43 and Swan 66 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nautor 43 | Nautor 43 | Swan 66 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 56.4 ft17.19 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 56.4 ft17.19 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 17.7 ft5.39 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Displacement | 33,069 lb15,000 kg | 66,139 lb30,000 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | 20,720 lb9,398 kg |
| Sail area | 832 ft²77.3 m² | 2,347 ft²218.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.92 | 22.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 472 | 165 |
| Comfort ratio | 49.0 | 39.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.73 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 10.1 |
Nautor 43 vs Swan 66: the short version
- The Swan 66 is the larger boat at 56.4 ft17.19 m LOA versus 31.5 ft9.60 m for the Nautor 43.
- The Swan 66 is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 66 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 12.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautor 43 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nautor 43 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.75).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.