Nautor 43 vs Swan 82
How do the Nautor 43 and Swan 82 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nautor 43 | Nautor 43 | Swan 82 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 69.8 ft21.26 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 69.8 ft21.26 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 19.2 ft5.86 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 12.4 ft3.78 m |
| Displacement | 33,069 lb15,000 kg | 83,776 lb38,000 kg |
| Ballast | 9,040 lb4,100 kg | 29,300 lb13,290 kg |
| Sail area | 832 ft²77.3 m² | 3,474 ft²322.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.92 | 29.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 472 | 110 |
| Comfort ratio | 49.0 | 36.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.73 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 11.2 |
Nautor 43 vs Swan 82: the short version
- The Swan 82 is the larger boat at 69.8 ft21.26 m LOA versus 31.5 ft9.60 m for the Nautor 43.
- The Swan 82 is heavier, displacing about 153% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 82 carries the more powerful rig (29.0 vs 12.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nautor 43 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nautor 43 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.