New York 30 vs Swan 55 Frers
How do the New York 30 and Swan 55 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
New York 30 
Swan 55 Frers | New York 30 | Swan 55 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.11 m | 42.9 ft13.07 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 42.9 ft13.07 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Displacement | 17,782 lb8,066 kg | 52,029 lb23,600 kg |
| Ballast | 8,800 lb3,992 kg | 19,900 lb9,026 kg |
| Sail area | 1,057 ft²98.2 m² | 1,147 ft²106.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.82 | 13.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 294 | 295 |
| Comfort ratio | 50.8 | 47.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.23 | 1.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 8.8 |
New York 30 vs Swan 55 Frers: the short version
- The New York 30 and Swan 55 Frers are close in length (43.0 ft13.11 m vs 42.9 ft13.07 m ).
- The Swan 55 Frers is heavier, displacing about 193% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the New York 30 carries the more powerful rig (24.8 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The New York 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the New York 30 rates better for offshore work (1.23 vs 1.70).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.