New Zealand 45 vs Nonsuch 40
How do the New Zealand 45 and Nonsuch 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
New Zealand 45 | New Zealand 45 | Nonsuch 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 45.0 ft13.72 m | 45.0 ft13.70 m |
| Waterline length | 36.5 ft11.13 m | 40.0 ft12.20 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.19 m | 14.1 ft4.30 m |
| Draft | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Displacement | 22,000 lb9,979 kg | 26,896 lb12,200 kg |
| Ballast | 10,515 lb4,770 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 900 ft²83.6 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 18.34 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 202 | 187 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.5 | 29.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 8.5 |
New Zealand 45 vs Nonsuch 40: the short version
- The New Zealand 45 and Nonsuch 40 are close in length (45.0 ft13.72 m vs 45.0 ft13.70 m ).
- The Nonsuch 40 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Nonsuch 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 40 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.