Newport 16 vs Skipjack 15
How do the Newport 16 and Skipjack 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Newport 16 
Skipjack 15 | Newport 16 | Skipjack 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 14.6 ft4.44 m |
| Waterline length | 13.7 ft4.17 m | —— |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 750 lb340 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | 250 lb113 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 143 ft²13.3 m² | 125 ft²11.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 27.72 | 41.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 131 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 7.1 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.75 | 3.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | — |
Newport 16 vs Skipjack 15: the short version
- The Newport 16 is the larger boat at 15.6 ft4.75 m LOA versus 14.6 ft4.44 m for the Skipjack 15.
- The Newport 16 is heavier, displacing about 121% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Skipjack 15 carries the more powerful rig (41.1 vs 27.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Newport 16 rates better for offshore work (2.75 vs 3.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.