Newport 41 vs Swan 48 Frers
How do the Newport 41 and Swan 48 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Newport 41 
Swan 48 Frers | Newport 41 | Swan 48 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.0 ft12.50 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Beam | 11.3 ft3.43 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 18,000 lb8,165 kg | 31,526 lb14,300 kg |
| Ballast | 8,215 lb3,726 kg | 12,100 lb5,488 kg |
| Sail area | 741 ft²68.8 m² | 1,142 ft²106.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.26 | 18.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 298 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.3 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 8.6 |
Newport 41 vs Swan 48 Frers: the short version
- The Newport 41 and Swan 48 Frers are close in length (41.0 ft12.50 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- The Swan 48 Frers is heavier, displacing about 75% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 48 Frers carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 48 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Newport 41 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.79).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.