Nonsuch 26 vs Ranger 26-2
How do the Nonsuch 26 and Ranger 26-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nonsuch 26 
Ranger 26-2 | Nonsuch 26 | Ranger 26-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.0 ft7.92 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Waterline length | 24.4 ft7.44 m | 19.8 ft6.03 m |
| Beam | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 8,500 lb3,856 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 2,750 lb1,247 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 420 ft²39.0 m² | 284 ft²26.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.13 | 21.85 |
| Displacement / Length | 261 | 173 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.0 | 13.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.0 |
Nonsuch 26 vs Ranger 26-2: the short version
- The Nonsuch 26 and Ranger 26-2 are close in length (26.0 ft7.92 m vs 26.0 ft7.92 m ).
- The Nonsuch 26 is heavier, displacing about 183% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 26-2 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 26 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.