Northern 1/4 Ton vs Ranger 23
How do the Northern 1/4 Ton and Ranger 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Northern 1/4 Ton | Northern 1/4 Ton | Ranger 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.7 ft7.21 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 19.3 ft5.89 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.57 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 3,400 lb1,542 kg | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Ballast | 1,450 lb658 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 219 ft²20.3 m² | 244 ft²22.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.50 | 17.27 |
| Displacement / Length | 210 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.9 | 15.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Northern 1/4 Ton vs Ranger 23: the short version
- The Northern 1/4 Ton and Ranger 23 are close in length (23.7 ft7.21 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 23 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 23 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.