Northwind 29 vs Ohlson 8.8
How do the Northwind 29 and Ohlson 8.8 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Northwind 29 
Ohlson 8.8 | Northwind 29 | Ohlson 8.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.8 ft8.78 m | 28.9 ft8.80 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 23.9 ft7.30 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 9.3 ft2.85 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 5.6 ft1.72 m |
| Displacement | 6,600 lb2,994 kg | 7,937 lb3,600 kg |
| Ballast | 3,180 lb1,442 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 374 ft²34.7 m² | 355 ft²33.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.01 | 14.28 |
| Displacement / Length | 277 | 258 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 24.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | — | €7,900 |
Northwind 29 vs Ohlson 8.8: the short version
- The Northwind 29 and Ohlson 8.8 are close in length (28.8 ft8.78 m vs 28.9 ft8.80 m ).
- The Ohlson 8.8 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Northwind 29 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 8.8 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 8.8 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.