Northwind 29 vs Paceship 20
How do the Northwind 29 and Paceship 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Northwind 29 
Paceship 20 | Northwind 29 | Paceship 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.8 ft8.78 m | 19.3 ft5.87 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 17.2 ft5.24 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 6,600 lb2,994 kg | 800 lb363 kg |
| Ballast | 3,180 lb1,442 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 374 ft²34.7 m² | 155 ft²14.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.01 | 28.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 277 | 70 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 4.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 3.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 5.6 |
Northwind 29 vs Paceship 20: the short version
- The Northwind 29 is the larger boat at 28.8 ft8.78 m LOA versus 19.3 ft5.87 m for the Paceship 20.
- The Northwind 29 is heavier, displacing about 725% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 20 carries the more powerful rig (28.8 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Northwind 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Northwind 29 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 3.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.