Northwind 29 vs Paceship 23
How do the Northwind 29 and Paceship 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Northwind 29 
Paceship 23 | Northwind 29 | Paceship 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.8 ft8.78 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 6,600 lb2,994 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 3,180 lb1,442 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 374 ft²34.7 m² | 225 ft²20.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.01 | 20.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 277 | 150 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 11.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 2.42 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Northwind 29 vs Paceship 23: the short version
- The Northwind 29 is the larger boat at 28.8 ft8.78 m LOA versus 23.0 ft7.01 m for the Paceship 23.
- The Northwind 29 is heavier, displacing about 187% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.7 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Northwind 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Northwind 29 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.