Ocean 40 vs Wilderness 40
How do the Ocean 40 and Wilderness 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ocean 40 | Ocean 40 | Wilderness 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.0 ft12.19 m | 40.0 ft12.19 m |
| Waterline length | 31.8 ft9.70 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.89 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 9,000 lb4,082 kg |
| Ballast | 9,100 lb4,128 kg | 3,969 lb1,800 kg |
| Sail area | 769 ft²71.4 m² | 597 ft²55.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.28 | 22.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 123 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.9 | 14.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.6 |
Ocean 40 vs Wilderness 40: the short version
- The Ocean 40 and Wilderness 40 are close in length (40.0 ft12.19 m vs 40.0 ft12.19 m ).
- The Ocean 40 is heavier, displacing about 111% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Wilderness 40 carries the more powerful rig (22.1 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ocean 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ocean 40 rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.