O'Day 25 vs O'Day 272
How do the O'Day 25 and O'Day 272 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| O'Day 25 | O'Day 272 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.8 ft7.57 m | 26.9 ft8.21 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 22.9 ft6.99 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 4,007 lb1,818 kg | 5,375 lb2,438 kg |
| Ballast | 1,825 lb828 kg | 1,930 lb875 kg |
| Sail area | 269 ft²25.0 m² | 299 ft²27.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.06 | 15.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 199 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.5 | 18.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.4 |
O'Day 25 vs O'Day 272: the short version
- The O'Day 272 is the larger boat at 26.9 ft8.21 m LOA versus 24.8 ft7.57 m for the O'Day 25.
- The O'Day 272 is heavier, displacing about 34% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the O'Day 25 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The O'Day 272 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the O'Day 25 rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
O'Day 25
O'Day 272