O'Day 272 vs Soling
How do the O'Day 272 and Soling compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
O'Day 272 
Soling | O'Day 272 | Soling | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 26.9 ft8.20 m |
| Waterline length | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 6.2 ft1.90 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 5,375 lb2,438 kg | 2,282 lb1,035 kg |
| Ballast | 1,930 lb875 kg | 1,257 lb570 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 739 ft²68.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.59 | 68.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 199 | 127 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.4 | 14.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.0 |
O'Day 272 vs Soling: the short version
- The O'Day 272 and Soling are close in length (26.9 ft8.21 m vs 26.9 ft8.20 m ).
- The O'Day 272 is heavier, displacing about 136% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Soling carries the more powerful rig (68.2 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The O'Day 272 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Soling rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.