O'Day 272 vs Yngling
How do the O'Day 272 and Yngling compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
O'Day 272 
Yngling | O'Day 272 | Yngling | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Waterline length | 22.9 ft6.99 m | 15.4 ft4.70 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 3.4 ft1.05 m |
| Displacement | 5,375 lb2,438 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Ballast | 1,930 lb875 kg | 683 lb310 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 156 ft²14.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.59 | 20.71 |
| Displacement / Length | 199 | 161 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.4 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 5.3 |
O'Day 272 vs Yngling: the short version
- The O'Day 272 is the larger boat at 26.9 ft8.21 m LOA versus 20.8 ft6.35 m for the Yngling.
- The O'Day 272 is heavier, displacing about 306% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Yngling carries the more powerful rig (20.7 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The O'Day 272 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the O'Day 272 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.