Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Prospect 900
How do the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Prospect 900 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 
Prospect 900 | Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 | Prospect 900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.80 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.70 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.13 | 12.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 306 | 288 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.6 | 24.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €6,500 | — |
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Prospect 900: the short version
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Prospect 900 are close in length (28.9 ft8.80 m vs 28.8 ft8.79 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 carries the more powerful rig (15.1 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 1.89).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.