Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Thames Marine Mirage 29
How do the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Thames Marine Mirage 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 | Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 | Thames Marine Mirage 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.80 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.70 m | 25.3 ft7.70 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 8,267 lb3,750 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 353 ft²32.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.13 | 13.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 306 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.6 | 21.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Average used price | €6,500 | — |
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Thames Marine Mirage 29: the short version
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Thames Marine Mirage 29 are close in length (28.9 ft8.80 m vs 28.8 ft8.79 m ).
- The Thames Marine Mirage 29 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 carries the more powerful rig (15.1 vs 13.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.