Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Watkins 29
How do the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Watkins 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 | Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 | Watkins 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.80 m | 28.9 ft8.81 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.70 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 370 ft²34.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.13 | 13.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 306 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.6 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €6,500 | — |
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Watkins 29: the short version
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Watkins 29 are close in length (28.9 ft8.80 m vs 28.9 ft8.81 m ).
- The Watkins 29 is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 carries the more powerful rig (15.1 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.