Ohlson 8.8 vs Prospect 900
How do the Ohlson 8.8 and Prospect 900 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Ohlson 8.8 | Prospect 900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.80 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Waterline length | 23.9 ft7.30 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.72 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 7,937 lb3,600 kg | 7,275 lb3,300 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.28 | 12.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 258 | 288 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.6 | 24.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €7,900 | — |
Ohlson 8.8 vs Prospect 900: the short version
- The Ohlson 8.8 and Prospect 900 are close in length (28.9 ft8.80 m vs 28.8 ft8.79 m ).
- The Ohlson 8.8 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ohlson 8.8 carries the more powerful rig (14.3 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 8.8 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 8.8 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 1.89).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Prospect 900